Hello TELKOM SPEEDY!
Its been (almost) 1 month, the connections were like this.
I NEED MY FAST CONNECTION BACK!!!!!!
Here are my ping result:
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=914ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=1051ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=993ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=939ms TTL=52
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=763ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=1280ms TTL=52
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=1386ms TTL=52
Request timed out.
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=772ms TTL=52
Request timed out.
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=936ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=627ms TTL=52
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=881ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=923ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=990ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=746ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=819ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=1006ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=642ms TTL=52
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=923ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=917ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=861ms TTL=52
Request timed out.
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=985ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=787ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=1057ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=746ms TTL=52
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=789ms TTL=52
Reply from 209.131.36.158: bytes=32 time=708ms TTL=52
Ping statistics for 209.131.36.158:
Packets: Sent = 3713, Received = 3498, Lost = 215 (5% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 275ms, Maximum = 2174ms, Average = 557ms
Leave a Reply